Microsoft Azure Architect Design (AZ-301) Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Microsoft Azure Architect Design (AZ-301) Exam with interactive quizzes featuring flashcards and multiple-choice questions, each packed with hints and explanations to ace your certification test!

Start Multiple Choice Practice Test
Start Flash Cards

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.

What recovery strategy should be recommended for virtual machines in Azure that minimizes costs in the event of a region failure?

  1. Store the disks in a Standard_LRS storage account

  2. Store the disks in a Standard_GRS storage account and configure Azure Site Recovery

  3. Store the disks in a Standard_LRS storage account and use Azure Resource Manager templates

  4. Store the disks in a Standard_GRS storage account

The correct answer is: Store the disks in a Standard_GRS storage account and configure Azure Site Recovery

The recommended recovery strategy for minimizing costs in the event of a region failure is to store the disks in a Standard_GRS (Geo-Redundant Storage) storage account and configure Azure Site Recovery. This approach combines both high availability and cost-efficiency. Using Standard_GRS ensures that your data is replicated to a secondary region, which provides durability and resilience against regional failures. If a failure were to occur in the primary region, you would be able to fail over to a secondary region seamlessly, minimizing downtime. This replication is essential for disaster recovery scenarios where businesses need to maintain continuity. Moreover, Azure Site Recovery complements this by automating the replication of virtual machines to a secondary location. It enables you to manage and orchestrate failover and failback processes efficiently, making it cheaper than maintaining a fully redundant and always-on infrastructure in another region. As a result, this option provides a balanced approach in terms of cost and reliability, ensuring that businesses can recover quickly while keeping expenses under control. On the other hand, using Standard_LRS would only provide local redundancy, lacking the necessary protection from regional failures. Utilizing just Azure Resource Manager templates doesn't directly provide a recovery strategy since it relates more to deployment infrastructure. Lastly, while storing disks in Standard_GRS alone

More Questions Like This